Bitacoreando

29/10/2005

Varios tests..

Pues todo el planeta linux está haciendo estos tests, aquí están mis resultados

The 2-Variable Intuition Test

Very Well-Rounded

You have:
62% SCIENTIFIC INTUITION and
70% EMOTIONAL INTUITION

The graph on the right represents your place in Intuition 2-Space. As you can see, you scored above average on emotional intuition and above average on scientific intuition. (Weirdly, your emotional and scientific intuitions are equally strong.)
Your Emotional Intuition score is a measure of how well you understand people, especially their unspoken needs and sympathies. A high score score usually indicates social grace and persuasiveness. A low score usually means you’re good at Quake.

Your Scientific Intuition score tells you how in tune you are with the world around you; how well you understand your physical and intellectual environment. People with high scores here are apt to succeed in business and, of course, the sciences.

Try my other test!
The 3 Variable Funny Test
It rules.

My test tracked 2 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 26% on Scientific
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 62% on Interpersonal

Link: The 2-Variable Intuition Test written by jason_bateman on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test

The 3 Variable Funny Test

the Idiot Savant
(33% dark, 53% spontaneous, 52% vulgar)
your humor style:
VULGAR | SPONTANEOUS | LIGHT

You like things silly, immediate, and, above all, outrageous. Ixne on the subtle word play, more testicles on fire, please. People like you are the most likely to RECEIVE internet forwards–and also the most likely to save them in a special folder entitled ‘HOLY SHIT’.

Because it’s so easily appreciated, and often wacky and physical, your sense of humor never ceases to amuse your friends. Most realize that there’s a sly intelligence and a knowing wink to your tastes. Your sense of humor could be called ‘anti-pretentious’–but paradoxically enough, that indicates you’re smarter than most.

PEOPLE LIKE YOU: Johnny Knoxville – Jimmy Kimmel

The 3-Variable Funny Test!
– it rules –

If you’re interested, try my latest: The Terrorism Test


My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 9% on darkness
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 72% on spontaneity
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 82% on vulgarity
Link: The 3 Variable Funny Test written by jason_bateman on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test

————– Y el test político

You are a
Social Liberal
(80% permissive)

and an…
Economic Liberal
(10% permissive)

You are best described as a:

Socialist

Link: The Politics Test on Ok Cupid
Also: The OkCupid Dating Persona Test

Filed under: Bitacoreando — ruben @ 1:46 pm

28/10/2005

El anuncio de las pelotitas en SF

 Video super tranquilo de una nueva televisión de Sony.. el video vale la pena, la tele no se :-)

 

 

 

Sony20BRAVIA20-20The20Advert

Revisando ligas viejas, me encuentro con que la anteror ya no funciona. Pueden ver el anuncio en esta liga

Filed under: Bitacoreando — ruben @ 10:40 pm

16/10/2005

Dos juegos para matar el rato

 

El primero es: Web Sudoku – Billions of Free Sudoku Puzzles to Play Online

Alguna vez había visto este juego, y en /. alguien mencionó un sitio muy sencillo para jugar con tu navegador

Web Sudoku – Billions of Free Sudoku Puzzles to Play Online

El segundo es Petals around the rose

 

Petals Around the Rose

(vía /.) 

Filed under: Bitacoreando — ruben @ 5:36 pm

15/10/2005

“The Shining” as if created by Cameron Crowe (Hilarious!)

Si el resplandor lo hiciera cualquier otro…

 

SHINING FINAL.mov (video/quicktime Object)

(vía del.icio.us) 

Filed under: Bitacoreando, Cine — ruben @ 10:54 pm

Civics Student…or Enemy of America?

Chéquen esto por favor:

AlterNet

Civics Student…or Enemy of America?

By Matthew Rothschild, The Progressive
Posted on October 7, 2005, Printed on October 15, 2005
http://www.alternet.org/story/26503/

Selina Jarvis is the chair of the social studies department at Currituck County High School in North Carolina, and she is not used to having the Secret Service question her or one of her students.

But that’s what happened on September 20.

Jarvis had assigned her senior civics and economics class "to take photographs to illustrate their rights in the Bill of Rights," she says. One student "had taken a photo of George Bush out of a magazine and tacked the picture to a wall with a red thumb tack through his head. Then he made a thumb’s-down sign with his own hand next to the President’s picture, and he had a photo taken of that, and he pasted it on a poster."

According to Jarvis, the student, who remains anonymous, was just doing his assignment, illustrating the right to dissent. But over at the Kitty Hawk Wal-Mart, where the student took his film to be developed, this right is evidently suspect.

An employee in that Wal-Mart photo department called the Kitty Hawk police on the student. And the Kitty Hawk police turned the matter over to the Secret Service. On Tuesday, September 20, the Secret Service came to Currituck High.

"At 1:35, the student came to me and told me that the Secret Service had taken his poster," Jarvis says. "I didn’t believe him at first. But they had come into my room when I wasn’t there and had taken his poster, which was in a stack with all the others."

She says the student was upset. "He was nervous, he was scared, and his parents were out of town on business," says Jarvis. She, too, had to talk to the Secret Service.

"Halfway through my afternoon class, the assistant principal got me out of class and took me to the office conference room," she says. "Two men from the Secret Service were there. They asked me what I knew about the student. I told them he was a great kid, that he was in the homecoming court, and that he’d never been in any trouble."

Then they got down to his poster.

"They asked me, didn’t I think that it was suspicious," she recalls. "I said no, it was a Bill of Rights project!"

At the end of the meeting, they told her the incident "would be interpreted by the U.S. attorney, who would decide whether the student could be indicted," she says.

The student was not indicted, and the Secret Service did not pursue the case further.

"I blame Wal-Mart more than anybody," she says. "I was really disgusted with them. But everyone was using poor judgment, from Wal-Mart up to the Secret Service."

When contacted, an employee in the photo department at the Wal-Mart in Kitty Hawk said, "You have to call either the home office or the authorities to get any information about that."

Jacquie Young, a spokesperson for Wal-Mart at company headquarters, did not provide comment within a 24-hour period.

Sharon Davenport of the Kitty Hawk Police Department said, "We just handed it over" to the Secret Service. "No investigative report was filed." Jonathan Scherry, spokesman for the Secret Service in Washington, D.C., said, "We certainly respect artistic freedom, but we also have the responsibility to look into incidents when necessary. In this case, it was brought to our attention from a private citizen, a photo lab employee."

Jarvis uses one word to describe the whole incident: "ridiculous."

Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive.

© 2005 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/26503/

(vía BoingBoing)
original en http://www.alternet.org/walmart/26503/

 

Filed under: Bitacoreando — ruben @ 5:02 pm
Next Page »

Powered by WordPress